The given chart shows the information about the whole number of minutes of telephone call in UK during year 1995 to 2000 and that separate into three calls types, which type are local calls, national and international calls, mobile calls.
According to the, Indian 1995, UK people had most used to local call and international or national calls,it were almost 70 and 35 billions minutes, when in same year, mobaile calls had less used by UK people as compared to the other calls category, which was nearly 3 billions minutes. In addition, total ratio of people spent time in local calls in year 1996, which was highest number of minutes approximately by 40 and 75 million minutes as compared to the national or international calls and mobile calls.
Furthermore ,local fixed line call used same number of billions minutes through UK people, it was more than 19 billions minutes respectively. Moreover, national and international fixed line calls grew steadily from 38 billions to 61 billions at the end of period in the chart.
To sum up, it can be seen that, in year 1995 to 2002, two call category had been increasing as well as local calls type minutes of number from the beginning remained the same at end of the year.
- People are surrounded by advertising which has increasing effect on our lives Do you think the positive effects of this outweigh the negative effects 84
- In many western countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children What are the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...al calls, mobile calls. According to the, Indian 1995, UK people had most used to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...call and international or national calls,it were almost 70 and 35 billions minutes,...
^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'calls'' or 'call's'?
Suggestion: calls'; call's
...d by UK people as compared to the other calls category, which was nearly 3 billions m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...time in local calls in year 1996, which was highest number of minutes approximately by 40 a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l calls and mobile calls. Furthermore ,local fixed line call used same number o...
^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...en that, in year 1995 to 2002, two call category had been increasing as well as local ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, well, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56541335356 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2186266473 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.0 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378772132011 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198077590392 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484949172475 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236261852537 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375665867633 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.