The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the time of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories: local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line, and mobile (all calls), from 1995 till 2002. The number is measured in billions.
In the 1999, local fixed-line was used 100 minutes, it is the highest point of this call type. The lowest point of this represent approximately 70 minutes in 2002.
The using of national and international-fixed lines at the middle of this graph and it grew only gradually. In 1995 it had the rate between 30 and 40 minutes, 1997 it increased to approximately 45 minutes, in 1999 this type was used 50 minutes. So, it has not a big difference. But, comparing it with the local-fixed line, the bar chat shows that national and international-fixed lines are less popular.The reverse of the 1995 in telephone call are mobile calls, less than 10 minutes in the UK. It considerably increased till 2002. The rate shows approximately 45 minutes, that is lower than national and international-fixed line, and local-fixed line.
Overall, the highest point of local fixed line is in the 1999 year, the highest point of national and international-fixed line is in 2002 and, also, this year figures the pick of mobile using.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ernational-fixed lines are less popular.The reverse of the 1995 in telephone call a...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00961538462 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37968117172 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.0560188719 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126430041484 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580030249703 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681077896429 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103238183571 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925005837173 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.