The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by
twelve different countries.
The given bar chart details the statistical information representing the number of various types of medals(gold, silver, and bronze) won by 12 different countries in the Olympics games.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of each type of medals were won by the USA, followed next by the Soviet Union. However, Japan was ranked in the least position in this context.
According to the given illustration, more than 2,000 medals consisting of the highest number of gold(1,000), 900 silver, and 500 bronze were won by the USA. Moving on, the Soviet Union bagged exactly 1000 medals in all. Furthermore, whilst the UK bagged almost the same number of each type of medals to stay below 1000, Germany and Italy showed a similar pattern to level off at 500 in the total number of medals.
Also, while Sweden and Hungary won one-fifth of the medals earned by the USA, Australia, East Germany, and China reached on par with each other at 300 medals. However, with 100 fewer medals, Japan plunged down to the least rank in the chart.
- The line graph shows changes in the per capita consumption of beef pork broilers and turkey in the United States between 1955 and 2012 78
- The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled PMT by transportation type in 2002 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 Describe the information 73
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 89
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...en illustration, more than 2,000 medals comprising of the highest number of gold1,000, 900 si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89617486339 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46673954148 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612021857923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1620810473 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30613855105 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105883335574 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084907814073 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160490196689 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879617415131 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.