The given bar graph illustrates how much one country’s income in the export of five different products in 2015 and 2016, and the table shows the amount of change of such stuffs in the same years.
Overall, what stands out from the bar graph is that the export of petroleum earned the major income for both years, and all products showed upward trends except gems and jewelry. However, we can see from the table that the widest values change is in the sells of textiles.
Looking into more detail, petroleum and engineered good sells gave major income for the country which earned approximately $61 and $61 billion in 2015 respectively. Then, both increased slightly in the next year to finish at about $62 and $61 billion in turn. Following this was the sells of gems and jewelry which showed different trend. This product had a slight decline in earnings from $43 to $41billion in the given years. As regards agricultural products, the figures remained stable at just above $30 billion. Moving to textile, although it was the lowest figures in 2015, then it rose and finished aproximately $32 billion in 2016.
Turning to the change in incomes, it can be seen that textiles sales had the widest change which was 15.24% followed by engineered goods, gems and jewellry, petroleum products, and agricultural products with 8.5%, 5.18%, 3%, and 0.81% in turn.
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 84
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 67
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 78
- the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...howed different trend. This product had a slightly decline in earnings from 3 to 1 in the given ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he lowest figures in 2015, then it rose an finished aproximately 2 billion in 2016...
^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... it can be seen that textiles sales had a widest change which was 15.24% followed...
^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... with 8.5%, 5.18%, 3%, and 0.81% in turn..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, then, well, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83982683983 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57841544997 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6026078525 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180826105871 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684715589726 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077270418337 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126880913448 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898941303586 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.