The bar chart illustrates the amount of rubbish accumulated by a recycling centre over a course of five consecutive years, starting in 2011.
As can be observed from the graph, it is evident that the total amount of all four types waste collected increased over the time frame. Additionally, whereas paper was the most collected type of recyclable waste, the opposite was true for garden waste during the period.
In 2011, paper was the most accumulated type of waste, at just under 60 tons, while about 50 tons of glass was collected. At the same time, the figures for waste collection of tin and garden were 35 and 32 tons, respectively. The next year indicated a parallel pattern in which the highest figure belonged to paper (50 tons), followed by glass (41 tons), tins (27 tons) and paper (15 tons).
The amount of collected waste paper hit the lowest point of 40 tons in 2013 before rising to 70 tons in 2015, which was the highest figure for all examined years. Meanwhile, the figures for the other types of waste all witnessed fluctuations throughout the period, with 52 tons of glass, 39 tons of tin and 35 tons of garden waste being collected in the last year.
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67632850242 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50536077206 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9259623827 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204141181668 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097702194612 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564053410748 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136826590176 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558876295306 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.