The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The given bar graph illustrates the amount of waste collected by a recycling centre over the course of 5 consecutive years, starting in 2011.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evident that the total amount of all 4 types of recyclable waste collected increased over the time frame. Additionally, despite some fluctuations, the amount of paper collection was by far the highest among other types of waste collection.
In 2011, paper was the most collected waste, at just under 57 tons, followed by 48 tons of glass were collected. At the same time, the figures for waste collection for tins and garden were 35 and 32 tons respectively. The next year has shown the same trend in which the highest figure belonged to paper (50 tons), followed by glass (41 tons), tins (27 tons) and paper (15 tons).
From that time onwards, the amount of paper waste collection dramatically went up to reach a hight of 70 tons in the last year despite a modest drop in the middle-years. Meanwhile, glass was also marked up around 52 tons at the end of the observed period, which is the second-highest among other types of recyclable waste. The figures for tin and garden were similar at roughly 39 and 35 tons in 2015.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66511627907 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64867284134 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2315176873 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213247329452 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100025176072 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742248970844 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157154915045 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706731959892 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.