The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The bar chart compares four types of waste accumulated by a recycling centre : paper, glass, tins and garden from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, Although four kinds of waste experienced a downward trend in the first four years, the last years those had a slight growth. Paper consistently had the highest tons of waste but the opposite was true for glass in 2013.
In 2011, the value of paper was leading with 57 tons of waste, the figure for second rate glass was 48 tons. The decrease was continuous in 2012. Paper had a substantial decline by 10 tons while glass was a moderate increase to 48 tons similar to the numbers of those in 2011. However, in 2014 paper grew again to 51 tons and glass slightly fell by 2 tons. Paper rose significantly to 70 tons, glass increased once more to 52 tons in 2015.
Contrast, the figure for tins and garden was 35 and 32 tons in the first years. Next year, a dramatical reduction by 17 tons for garden and 8 tons for tins. They grew up once again then fell once more in the following 2 years. In 2015, tins increased to 39 tons whereas garden was 35 tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | lavien | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 73
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44334975369 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32067335016 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5642550518 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1666666667 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121863342496 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546422770623 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103703922349 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128007376542 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152551505455 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44334975369 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32067335016 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5642550518 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1666666667 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121863342496 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546422770623 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103703922349 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128007376542 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152551505455 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.