The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The bar chart illustrates the number of waste counted in tons that have been recycled by a waste processing centre in the period of 2011 to 2015. It is divided into 4 different categories, such as paper, glass, tin and garden waste.
Overall, trash collection decreased from 2011 to 2013 and rose again in 2015. The amount of paper waste was highest and stayed at the top of the chart while the amount of garden waste remained the least. The year 2015 was the year when all 4 categories reached their peak.
Paper waste had the highest number of all 4 categories. It peaked at 70 tons in 2015 and bottomed at 40 tons in 2013, which was greater than half the cost of other categories, except for glass. The smallest number belonged to garden waste in 2012 which was only 15 tons. In the whole period, glass waste fluctuated between around 40 and over 50 tons. while tin waste had the similar situation and numbers around 27 and nearly 40 tons annually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining themselves outside others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 56
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ted between around 40 and over 50 tons. while tin waste had the similar situation and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53757225434 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27481434702 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1787593979 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261087249854 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103325529234 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109040815582 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201172834485 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837722386036 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.