The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the amount of waste collected by a recycling centre in the 2011 - 2015 period.
Overall, four types of recyclable waste collected increased over the time frame. Despite some fluctuations, the proportion of paper waste was by far the highest among the others.
In 2011, the most collected waste was paper at just under 57 tons, followed by 48 tons glass at the second-highest position. At the same time, the figures for waste collection for tins and gardens were 35 and 32 tons, respectively. The next year has showed the same trend in which the top figure belonged to paper (50 tons), followed by glass (41 tons), tins (27 tons), and paper (15 tons).
Throughout the remainder of the period, the amount of paper waste saw a significant rise and reached its highest peak at 70 tons in 2015 despite a slight drop in the middle-year. Glass also went up around 52 tons at the end of the period and still stood at the second place. The figures for tins and gardens were similar at roughly 39 and 35 tons in 2015, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | minthechew | 78 | view |
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 92
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and the present day 85
- Some people think that climate change could have a negative effect on business Other people think that climate change could create more business opportunities Discuss both views 78
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The table shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Describe the main features of the figure 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64705882353 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5873764221 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3842151293 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141400792051 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771739368799 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848855292021 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128367429096 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100525577889 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.