The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The provided pie chart details the statistics highlighting the proportional distribution of various areas opted by the Anthropology graduates( from one university), while the table reveals the salary status based on the employment sector over a period of 5 years of work.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of the students chose full-time work, and most of the graduates earned the highest salary range in the government and freelance sector.
According to the given illustration, over half of the graduates shifted to full-time jobs, while only 15% joined part-time work. Moreover, whilst just below 10% of the total students went for full-time postgraduate study, merely 1 in every 20 students preferred part-time work with continued higher qualification. Also, of the total, the unemployed accounted for just 12% compared to only 8% with unknown status.
Turning to the salary, about 1 in every 10 private employees fell within salary slab($25000-$49,999) as against half in the other two sectors each. Almost above double the free lancing and government employees(15%) were private workers in the range of $50 000 to $74 999. In addition, 10% more freelancers earned between $75 000 and $99 999, whereas, nearly half of the government employees made up the maximum amount of more than $1 million followed next by freelancers(40%) and 30% private workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | TinaLam | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 89
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 84
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 89
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: FREE_LANCING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'freelancing'?
Suggestion: freelancing
...o sectors each. Almost above double the free lancing and government employees15% were privat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... made up the maximum amount of more than million followed next by freelancers40% ...
^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ade up the maximum amount of more than million followed next by freelancers40% and 30%...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96263664051 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642533936652 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9194454103 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.625 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116721785316 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487750704171 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619013389446 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847155870435 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689371093215 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.