The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided pie chart illustrates the career paths of Anthropologists of a university after completing their courses. Additionally, the accompanying table demonstrates the wages of those graduates after the course of a five-year working period, including freelance consultants, government sector and private companies.
Overall, it is evident that there was a prominent preference among anthropology students opting for full-time work and a majority of full-time employees in the anthropological field who earned from 75 million to 100 million after 5 years’ work in all sorts of categories surveyed.
According to the pie chart, full-time work held a significant position in the post-graduates’ career path, accounting for 52 percent of the overall number of respondents. The remaining portion was attributed equivalently to the five other kinds of work preferences in which Anthropologists opted for part-time works and the unemployed status with relatively large portions of 15 percent and 12 percent, respectively.
Moving to the table, the government sector witnessed a large share in the number of anthropology workers earning over 100 million throughout the 5 year period of working, with 50 percent of the number of respondents. The other two jobs also experienced the same trend in this wage. However, the salaries from 25,000 to 49,000 dollars achieved the smallest portions of 5 percent and 10 percent in all the three categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | TinaLam | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 78
- the diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottle 61
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- it is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvatages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57013574661 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33702354378 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601809954751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4906008395 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.875 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203836688408 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886691750018 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663800565386 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132514418694 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084815810217 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57013574661 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33702354378 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601809954751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4906008395 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.875 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203836688408 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886691750018 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663800565386 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132514418694 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084815810217 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.