The pie chart depicts various destination of students graduated from a particular Anthropology university while the table illustrates the payment level for the anthropologists in 3 types of employment after working 5 years.
Overall, according to the chart, the graduates were inclined to engage in full-time jobs rather than pursue postgraduate study while doing part-time work. In terms of the table, the anthropologists worked in private companies received lower salary level compared to freelance consultants or government sector.
Looking at the given chart, more than a half of the graduates participated in full-time occupations while only 5% of them followed higher study. In addition, 15% of the students chose part-time jobs and 8% of them became full-time postgraduates. At the same time, about one-fifth of the anthropologists were unknown or unemployed.
Turning to the table, after five-year working, about 80% of the anthropologists working as Freelance consultants or Government sector received about $75000 - $100000 and only 20% of them were paid $25000-$74000 per month. By contrast, working in private companies, about 45% of the graduates gained the lower payment level and about 55% of them earned the higher one.
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The diagram illustrates how steel rods are manufactured in the furniture industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16142346704 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57671957672 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0151016327 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192580773552 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858811378569 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696821001739 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131516247439 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752275663453 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.