It is commonly argued that whether or not more budgets should be mobilized and spent by the government for expanding the rail line systems rather than conventional roads. I do vigorously believe that for the improvement of our daily life, the railway system has been contributing plenty of achievements to humankind and must be contemplated to be enhanced by the national traffic ministry.
To begin with, it is worth improving train track systems because of better traffic conditions. Once the government takes action with the railways’ quality, people will prefer using trains rather than personal cars. Therefore, not only traffic bottleneck will immediately be reduced but also helps to reduce air emissions for the fact that gasoline cars are one of the substantial factors leading to air pollution. As a result, human health shall, by all means, enhance, and diminish the number of traffic casualties for the reason that fewer personal automobiles entering the road.
Furthermore, using trains for commuting to work is also a financial solution for workers. Should the government spends more budget on enhancing the railways’ quality and on-train services, the ticket price and the quality of a ride, therefore, shall be improved and more reasonable for users who are almost laborers. For instance, if the government invests in advancing railways with the reduction of the ticket fee from 5$ to 3$ for each ticket, the laborers can use the 2$ left to buy a nutrient breakfast for a hardworking day.
To sum up, I agree that spending more budgets on meliorating railways is an essential decision that the government should make. Therefore, not only our living environment is preserved but also accelerate the elements in our daily living standards.
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 78
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
It is commonly argued that whether or not more budgets should be mobilized and sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$5'.
Suggestion: $5
...th the reduction of the ticket fee from 5$ to 3$ for each ticket, the laborers can...
^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$3'.
Suggestion: $3
... reduction of the ticket fee from 5$ to 3$ for each ticket, the laborers can use t...
^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$2'.
Suggestion: $2
...r each ticket, the laborers can use the 2$ left to buy a nutrient breakfast for a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25795053004 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85919225208 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6683836823 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189860418462 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771539822606 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862437393641 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121202122483 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039162853456 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.