The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Given are the pie chart depicting the proportions of graduates in Anthropology majoring in a specific university following their future path and the table delineating the outcome they earn in five years later in three distinct sectors.
It is conspicuous that students opt for working in full-time jobs more than the other types which are showcased in the pie chart. In terms of the data in the table, the highest amount of paycheck Anthropology students acquiring comes from working in the government sector.
To begin with the first graph, the percentage of students who work full-time account for the highest rate with over a half, compared to 15 percent working part-time and 12 percent students are between jobs. In addition, full-time postgraduate study and undetermined job sectors shared a similar proportion of Anthropology graduates with a modest percent exactly 8% is documented. However, this is not the least favorable option because the category of those who did postgraduate study and at the same time had part-time jobs occupies less than 3%.
As information supplied from the table, 80 percent of the freelance consultants earned at least $75,000, half of whom were in the highest salary range of more than $100,000. Despite the fact that 80% of government employees earned at least $75,000, a very high number of government employees, at 50%, earned at least $100,000. In contrast, just 55% of individuals employed by private firms earned more than $75,000. Furthermore, graduates working in freelance consultants and government sectors share the same percentages in terms of salary from $25000 to $49999 and from $50000 to $74999 with 5% and 15%, respectively; whereas, private sector employees account for 10% and 35%, in turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 89
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In recent years governments have invested huge money on some main fields to create a strong country Some people think that governments should invest as much as money as possible on improving the education system Other people disagree and think that this m 87
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The Two Pie Charts Below Show Some Employment Patterns in Great Britain in 1992 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie chart depicting the proportions...
^^^
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aduates working in freelance consultants and government sectors share the same pe...
^^
Line 7, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 15%, respectively; whereas, private sector employees account for 10% and 35%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, whereas, at least, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19572953737 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8278091526 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5266594876 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125193118708 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543321880574 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507208791475 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929266911024 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527921057189 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie chart depicting the proportions...
^^^
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aduates working in freelance consultants and government sectors share the same pe...
^^
Line 7, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 15%, respectively; whereas, private sector employees account for 10% and 35%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, whereas, at least, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19572953737 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8278091526 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5266594876 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125193118708 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543321880574 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507208791475 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929266911024 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527921057189 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.