Some people think it is better for one single legal system throughout the world. Others say countries should have their own law. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
The concept of having one policy for all parts of the world emerging in modern societies. It is thought that mutual cosmopolitan legal law is favourable for human beings; however, there is a reverse stance of this outlook about should have each national regulation. From my perspective, I concur with the latter view owing to several compelling reasons.
Admittedly, a global government has power which can eliminate the possibility of war and have the same strategies to develop the economy. First, take the US as a typical example for the peace between 50 states when they share a federal government. Should humans have one single law system, the conflicts no longer exist and they can deal with the political problem in Afghanistan. Furthermore, the advancement in the economy of all countries is uneven. It has a myriad of impoverished nations compared to the wealthy ones which leads to the huge gap. Therefore, the cosmocracy can solve the issues and these powerful countries can share their policies to boost the economy of underprivileged regions. Nevertheless, these merits are merely the tip of an iceberg due to numerous downsides such as losing the cultural diversities of each nation and challenging to control almost all countries. Therefore, advocating for unitary government is judicious.
Further and even more important, each national authority is more likely to have a profound insight of all aspects in their countries which are straightforward to control and preserve their cultural diversities. To begin with, the government of a country will be the best informed about its domestic circumstances. If an issue arises, the government can address it swiftly and precisely; whereas it is problematic for the global government to do it thoroughly. Additionally, when there is a common government, the cultural identities of each nation will progressively diminish and possibly perish. Meanwhile, in terms of only one government, it is possible to preserve and propagate it throughout the world.
To sum up, although there are some benefits of having an all-powerful, unitary government, it is much more convenient for the prosperity of each region.
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree 73
- Government should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 90
- Food products labels should contain detailed information about that food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 84
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 69
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dmittedly, a global government has power which can eliminate the possibility of w...
^^
Line 3, column 860, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'controlling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: controlling
...ersities of each nation and challenging to control almost all countries. Therefore, advoc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31304347826 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10137342451 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4415935807 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196326993034 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059475762675 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049014210268 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118175067321 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281769381041 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.