The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie graph depicts different types of career done by Anthropology graduates after acquiring their bachelor’s degree. Meanwhile, the table compares their income earned in different occupations after 5 years
Overall, a majority of Anthropology graduates engaged with full-time work, while the opposition was seen in part-time work and postgrad study. In addition, Anthropology made the most money out of freelance consultants and government sector
Regarding the pie chart, apparently full-time job constituted more than half of the total destinations of Anthropology graduates, with 52%. In contrast, the figure for those who were part-time employees and did postgrad study was remarkably lower with merely 5%. Moreover, graduates who were clueless about what to do and those who did postgrad study full time shared the same proportion of 8%. And the remaining figures accounted for around 12% to 15% of the whole chart
Moving to the table, 80% of freelance consultants earned at least $75,000, half of whom were offered with more than $100,000 for their salaries. Similarly, there was also 80% of whom working in government sector had the minimum wage of $75,000, with 50% of them making more than $100,000 per year. In contrast, just 55% of graduates employed by private companies earned more than $75,000. Moreover, Anthropology graduates working in freelance consultants and government sector share the same proportion of 20% in terms of salary under $75,000, which was doubled by that of private companies
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | TinaLam | 67 | view |
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 55
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes that have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 78
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In the past people store knowledge in the books Nowadays people store knowledge on the Internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... to do and those who did postgrad study full time shared the same proportion of 8%. And t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was doubled by that of private companies
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, while, at least, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40506329114 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81871067616 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2758949963 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163817130096 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748928529769 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526372007708 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111643066276 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588128767344 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.