The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The chart illustrates the proportion of students in Anthropology work after graduating, and the table displays their salary range after five years of work.
In general, it can be seen that most graduated students choose full-time work rather than other forms of work. Moreover, most freelance consultants and employees in the government sector have a higher salary rate, which is at least 75000, while more than half of workers in private companies have the same rate.
As can be seen from the chart, full-time work takes over half of the graduates, with 52% compared to 15% of part-time jobs and 12% of unemployed. A slight majority of graduates also choose to study for an advanced degree while working full-time or part-time, with the former being 8% and the latter being 5%.
Out of the three categories in the table, freelancers have significantly higher pay, with 80% having at least 75000 and half of that proportion earning more than 100000. This rate is the same for employees in the government sector, but with a different distribution, 30% have a salary range of 75000 to 100000, and 50% have earned more than 100000. In comparison, only 55% of workers in private companies receive more than 75000. The other 45% of graduates are in the lower bracket, from 25000 to less than 75000. In contrast, the proportion of freelancers and the government sector in this lower bracket are the same at 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, at least, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90376569038 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65047487614 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523012552301 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9924351638 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141116895235 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680533905418 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107778992189 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134116651735 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143053107489 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.