The chart below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two bar graphs illustrate career categories of graduate and postgraduate students in the United Kingdom except those who had full-time work after leaving university in 2008.
Overall, in both two groups of students, doing further study was the orientation which was the most chosen, while doing volunteer work took the fewest choice.
Regarding the first picture, in the graduate group, approximately 30 thousand students chose extra study, followed by nearly 17,7 thousand one working part-time jobs. Unemployed students took a large number of over 16 thousands, after by 3500 people worked for charity lately.
According to the data in the second graph, the same trend as the aforementioned group had been witnessed by the highest number of 2725 postgraduate students who preferred to do further study. Those who had part-time jobs took more than 2500 ones, however, over 1600 post students had not been recruited yet for a year. Finally, there was only 345 choice to do voluntary work.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...art-time jobs. Unemployed students took a large number of over 16 thousands, after by 3500 people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, regarding, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2375 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64619420111 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68125 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3947236518 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167477469751 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803217997901 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666241206771 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111533661435 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788074833988 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.