The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage.
The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage.
In the period of 1990-1995, house prices in New York, Tokyo and London on average all fell down in comparison to them in 1989, as there was a 5%, 7.5% and 7.5% in those 3 cities respectively. Meanwhile, houses in Madrid and Frankfurt were more expensive than them one year ago, there was, however, only a slight growth in both as the prices went up by less than 3%.
The chart shows contrasting information in 1996-2002 period. Except for a 5% fall in expenses of houses in Tokyo, houses in other four cities mentioned all cost more than they did in the last six-year-period. Average houses prices in New York and Madrid grew up for about 5%, while prices in London increased a considerable 12% compared to them in 1989.
Overall there were increases and decreases in house prices in 5 cities and the changes were various.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-09 | dttt849200 | 73 | view |
- The chart gives information about sports played by young people by gender in Great Britain 84
- Some experts believe that is it better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The given table illustrates how consumers in 5 different countries spent their money on different items in 2002. Overall the figures in the table varied through the period. 73
- Many people hold a view that children should be taught to be part community by their parents, while others would argue that it is better for them to learn this at school. 78
- The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63583815029 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59819999016 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9961701993 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513798584157 0.215688989381 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2506942587 0.103423049105 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.236081797773 0.0843802449381 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392076764672 0.15604864568 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.353914171413 0.0819641961636 432% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.