The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage.
The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage.
In the period of 1990-1995, house prices in New York, Tokyo and London on average all fell down in comparison to them in 1989, as there was a 5%, 7.5% and 7.5% in those 3 cities respectively. Meanwhile, houses in Madrid and Frankfurt were more expensive than them one year ago, there was, however, only a slight growth in both as the prices went up by less than 3%.
The chart shows contrasting information in 1996-2002 period. Except for a 5% fall in expenses of houses in Tokyo, houses in other four cities mentioned all cost more than they did in the last six-year-period. Average houses prices in New York and Madrid grew up for about 5%, while prices in London increased a considerable 12% compared to them in 1989.
Overall there were increases and decreases in house prices in 5 cities and the changes were various.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-09 | dttt849200 | 73 | view |
- The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage. 73
- The chart gives information about sports played by young people by gender in Great Britain 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give you 56
- Some people hold a view that high school students must do community work as a mandatory part of their study program. 84
- Some experts believe that is it better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63583815029 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59819999016 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9961701993 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513798584157 0.215688989381 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2506942587 0.103423049105 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.236081797773 0.0843802449381 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392076764672 0.15604864568 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.353914171413 0.0819641961636 432% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.