The chart displays the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in the year 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart displays the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in the year 2005.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.

The chart exemplifies the quantity of oil generation and utilization in million barrels daily in seven regions of the world in the year 2005

Overall, the Former Soviet Union accounted for the least usage of oil whereas, the most significant consumer of oil was USA and Canada. Likewise, the largest segment in terms of production was the Middle East however, Europe was the least significant producer of the fuel.

On the one hand, the major consumer of oil was the USA and Canada and the usage of these nations were almost one-third of the total consumption. Meanwhile, Europe made up the third place in the list with an annual consumption of 21.4%. Similarly. Asia-Pacific had exhausted 27.8% of the world oil. In comparison, Middle East, Former Soviet Union, and Africa depleted fossil fuel steadily at the rate of 5.7%, 4.5% and 3.3%.

On the contrary, the substantial producer of fuel was the Middle East and provide almost 30% of oil. Furthermore, the contribution towards oil generation was moderately the same for Africa, Asia Pacific and the Former Soviet Union that goes for 10.5%, 10.7%, and 11.7%. Moreover, The USA and Canada produced almost three-fifths of their consumption. Finally, the utilization rates of Europe and Latin America recorded around 9% globally.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-20 Naman Kumar Singh 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ty of oil generation and utilization in million barrels daily in seven regions of the w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...st with an annual consumption of 21.4%. Similarly. Asia-Pacific had exhausted 27.8% of th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1619047619 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70869934732 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.393810763 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138551177634 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499468637307 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640922455152 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12212235823 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119278437961 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.