The chart explained the percentage of households with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week in 1920 to 2019
The charts above represent the number of electrical tools and hours of housework per week from 1920 until 2019. It is measured in percentages and hours. At first glance, it was evident that the highest number of ownership of electrical appliances occured in the last year whereas the longest time of doing housework happened in the initial of the year.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the chart that explained the percentage of household machines. According to the range of the year which start from 1920 to 1980, the tool which included washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners increased steadily with the highest number reached by refrigerators exactly 100%, followed by vacuum cleaners were 40% less than it and washing machines rose 30% in the initial forty years but decreased 10% in the next ten years. Then in 1980 to 2019, around 70% achieved by washing machines whilst refrigerators and vacuum cleaners gained the same number appropriately 100%.
Turning to the data of housework times per week in every household start on 1920 to 2019, the upper number was obtained in the first year, precisely 50 hours but decreased from 40 hours to 10 hours in the last ninety-nine years.
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful 73
- Average cinema visits by age groups 73
- The chart explained the percentage of households with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week in 1920 to 2019 84
- Some people think that spending a lot of on holding wedding parties birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money Others however think that these are necessary for individuals and the society Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The bar charts show different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03465346535 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67088727934 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.613129206 43.030603864 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.285714286 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410143162385 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189700474087 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141863148496 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282705436222 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1064665704 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.