The maps below represent the development in the Norbiton in the future
The maps above display the plan of refurbishment in Norbiton which is adding few facilities. At first glance, it can be seen many constructions would exist to make roads, housings, a playground, a school and a bridge in several points.
In the initial part, the picture consists many factories alongside of roads whereas the town is in the west, and the farmland is in the cross of the river. However, the circular road only has two branches and the south road would be connected to the t-junction.
In the second part, there would be a few housings replaced by the factories while the playground and school would be built in the east side, the playground is behind the housing and school in the end of road. Then, the circular roads have some additional of branches to the north and northwest. Thus, the bridge would be creating above of river to reach the housing that be built on the farmland continuing the north way. Next, in the future, a medical center and shops are made on the side of the biggest circular way while the tiniest circular is made from the t-junction on the old roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d would be connected to the t-junction. In the second part, there would be a few...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, then, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62051282051 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52493156767 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.152745753 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0285440454672 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0188300231234 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498195583661 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290041165015 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410180149211 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.