The given bar graph demonstrates the information about how many girls took admission for higher education after leaving school in five different nations in two distinct years,1980 and 2015.
After analysing, it is clear that half of the total population of a female school-leavers went for more education in France in the starting year which inclined by 5% in 2015. In South Korea, about 15% of ladies went to college or University for study in 1980 however it rapidly increased and reached at a double that was 30%.
Moving forward, in both given years, approximately one-sixth population of girls joined educational centres for higher education after school in Australia. In the starting year, proportion of the females was almost the same for the USA and the UK which was between 30% and 40%. In 2015 about 55% and almost 60% of girls took admission for higher education in the UK and the USA respectively.
Overall, the percentage of women going into higher education increased in given time period for all nations except Australia in which it remained stable.
- The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The chart gives information on the percentage of women going into higher education in five countries for the years 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05617977528 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74148093417 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.892421599 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232378694841 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110944978249 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052740115817 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150554616596 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367760135934 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.