The given line graph depicts the information about the number of memberships of gym given to both genders namely gents and ladies in the time period of three decades from 1980 to 2010.
As is observed in the graph, in the very beginning the number of memberships was a just about 1000 for ladies whereas it was approximately double 2000 for gents. In the year 1985, both showed an inclining trend and reached at about 1500 for females and about 4000 for males. Some fluctuations were noticed up to the year 1990. After half decade, the figure for men decreased by almost 2500 while it increased for other gender by almost 1500.
Moving forward, the digit of males getting membership rapidly increased and the figure change from about 1500 to 2500 however it gradually deceased for females. In 2005, the number of men gym membership was at the peak with 5000 but for women it was just 3000. In the last phase, the number of gym membership dropped to less than 1000 and about 2000 for males and females respectively.
Overall, it is clear that to the graph showed a lot of ups and downs as in the starting, there were more memberships for males as compared to females but in the last it changed and demonstrated the lowest figure for men membership.
- The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 67
- The chart gives information on the percentage of women going into higher education in five countries for the years 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60986547085 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44235353544 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7906729329 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18327993223 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844158473266 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646157864998 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133829723202 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519166295612 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.