The chart graph shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different types of attractions from 1980 to 2010

Essay topics:

The chart graph shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different types of attractions from 1980 to 2010.

The line graph give the information about the figure for visitors in four attractive destination in Scotland between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the category of castle mostly ranked the highest. In addition, while the groups of castle and zoo saw a increase, the opposite was true for festival and aquarum.
Initially, the figure for festival was recorded at 30%. Then, it gradually fell to just around 15% after 3 decades. With the proportion of travellers to aquarium, there was a sharp rise from 20% in 1980 to about 35% 5 years later. However, it decreased like intial, to around 20% in 1990. 5 years later, this figure had an insighnificant increase of 5% and then it declined steadily to around 10% in 2010.
Starting at about 25%, the percentage of people to castle peaked at nearly 45 % which was the highest at that time. After that, it drop to around 35%, however, it still ranked the top of list over the period. For the zoo, the figure for the tourists in the lowest point in the first years which is 10% and there was a fluctuation between 10% and 15% from 1980 to 2000. After 10 years, the percentage of visitors to that grew to 20%, two times as much as that in 1980.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-09 lalo 73 view
2022-07-26 anhtrtu 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'destination' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'destinations'.
Suggestion: destinations
... figure for visitors in four attractive destination in Scotland between 1980 and 2010. Ove...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... while the groups of castle and zoo saw a increase, the opposite was true for fes...
^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...he highest at that time. After that, it drop to around 35%, however, it still ranked...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, still, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50917431193 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43288596814 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.904422553 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137315202635 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472222934924 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706520191535 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993142444429 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944795938108 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.