The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000

Essay topics:

The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week (in kilometers) in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000.

The provided chart gives information on the average distance a person in UK travelling in a week by 5 different types of transportation from 1990 to 2000.

A glance at the chart reveals that in 1990 and 2000, people travelled by bus for the longest distance. However, in 1990, the least choice of people was airplane, while in 2000, bicycle was the least to use. In total, people in 2000 travelled more than people in 1990.

As presented in the bar chart, in 1990 the distance a person travelling in a week by bicycle was nearly 4 kilometers, while in 2000, the statistics declined to only 1 kilometer. A similar case occurred in motorbike section, with the distance estimated in 1990 doubled that in 2000.

A quite different picture can be seen in the other three transportations. In the air section, on average, a person travelled only 1 kilometer in a week in 1990, whereas in 2000, the figure rose to approximately 5 kilometers. In 1990, the distance a person travelling in a week by bus was 40 kilometers, while that in 2000 increased slightly by around 1 kilometer. Finally, there is a steady rise in the distance a person travelling by rail in 1990 and 2000, with around 35 kilometers and 36 kilometers respectively. In total, in 1990, a person travelled 100 kilometers in a week, while in 2000, the figure increased to 110 kilometers.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-16 MinhMinh122 view
2023-07-16 MinhMinh122 view
2023-06-10 baguette 78 view
2023-06-10 baguette view
2023-06-01 baguette 78 view
Essays by user minhpn :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73728813559 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98124463808 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436440677966 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7688946194 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409048043433 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189274016005 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10773309769 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289951981296 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961661503774 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.