The chart illustrates distances travelled per person per week (in kilometers) in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart compares figures concerning distances that an individual has gone in a week by five different modes of transportation, measured in kilometers, between 1990 and 2000.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that three out of five transportation modes enjoyed an upward trajectory, while others showed a moderate fall, making the total travelled distances increase. The most favourable types were by far bus and rail.
The bus remained the most commonly-used vehicle throughout the period. Having started at 40 kilometers per person, the figure for bus rose marginally to slightly above 40 kilometres in 2000. A similar pattern can be observed in rail, which began somewhat lower at 35 kilometers and experienced a small growth of 3 kilometers. In contrast, the trend of air travelling appeared to be fast-growing. With merely a kilometers in 1990, air displayed a fivefold increase in 10 years.
This pattern is generally reversed for bicycles and motorbikes with both ranging at somewhere around 2 kilometers and finished at approximately a kilometer.
Therefore, the total distance travelled by five transportation types showed an increase of 10% to 110 at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | MinhMinh122 | view | |
| 2023-07-16 | MinhMinh122 | view | |
| 2023-06-10 | baguette | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | baguette | view | |
| 2023-06-01 | baguette | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32291666667 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20799511204 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3987854102 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248947637621 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801130265473 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613134100342 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120283797449 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573888066094 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.