The chart illustrates the proportion of males and females using bicycles in 5 different age groups in 2011.
The chart illustrates the proportion of males and females using bicycles in 5 different age groups in 2011.
It is obvious that females were dominant in all ages in comprison with males. In addition, the percentage of people in the ages from 0 to 9 years old was in the majority.
In the term of the 0-9 year-old group, both genders were quite equally represented at 51.3% and 50.3% respectively for female and male. At 42.2%, the proportion of female people who cycled in the 10-17 age group was nearly twice as much as this of male ones represented at 24.6%. Besides, the female cyclists in the group of 18-39 years old was 17.1% which was about 7% as high as the male ones.
In the term of the 40-59 year-old group, there was a decrease of around 4% in the percentage of female people who rode cycles compared with this of male people represented at 8%. For the group above 60 years old, female and male people using bicycles accounted for 18.5% and 13.2% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 67
- The chart illustrates the proportion of males and females using bicycles in 5 different age groups in 2011. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unted for 18.5% and 13.2% respectively.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59090909091 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47484764536 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5158855534 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417553711204 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240944326228 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.290944852091 0.0843802449381 345% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382213497069 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.358730871097 0.0819641961636 438% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.