The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015
The pie charts delineate the approaches to studying English in three countries between 2010 and 2015.
As is shown in the pie charts, most English learners opted for evening classes to improve their language skills in three surveyed countries. Meanwhile, travelling to another country was quite popular in country A and B, and the reverse trend was true for country C in two surveyed years.
In 2010, evening classes were the number-one choice among English learners as 94% of them favoured this method in country C, far exceeding the figures for country A and B, at 70% and 72% respectively. Meanwhile, one-fourth of the surveyed people in country A learnt English when they travelled abroad, as opposed to one-fifth in country B. Online learning seemed to be the least popular way of learning as it only accounted for 5%, 8% and 6% in the proportions of English learners in country A, B and C in turn.
5 years later, fewer people enjoyed studying in evening classes in three countries as the figures declined by 3% in country A, 12% in country C and a dramatic 24% in country B. Online learning, on the other hand, was on the corresponding rise, representing 10% in country A, 15% in country C and a respectable 32% in country B. The figures for going abroad remained quite stable at 23% in country A and 20% in country B. This learning method started to take off in country C with an increase of 3% in 2015.
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 67
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 67
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... three countries between 2010 and 2015. As is shown in the pie charts, most Engl...
^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...learners in country A, B and C in turn. 5 years later, fewer people enjoyed stud...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6374501992 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69979632124 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498007968127 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8425724523 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338755930398 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160385330096 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874014829656 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250402296317 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967239987115 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.