The chart show the proportion graduate with with sciene degree and art degree in a company in 2000
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of students who got different degrees in science and art over 2 decades from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, Master Art represented the highest figure in the first year, and its position was replaced by First Degree- Science in 2010. In contrast, the proportion of scholars who graduated in PhD Science remained the lowest in both years. Moreover, while the percentage of students who had just finished their studies for PhD in Science and First Degree in both art and science underwent a significant growth, the other degrees bucked that trend. By comparision, in 1990, the number of alumnies from art were higher than that from science degrees, and the other pattern was true for the year 2000.
In 1990, there was an equal percentage of students who graduated from First Degree-Science and First Degree-Art with 18% and those figures rose considerably to 24% and 27% by agreement. In a similar fashion, PhD degree’s statistic witnessed a slight increase to 8% in 2000.
From 1990 to 2010, there’s a decline of 3% in the figures for students receving certificate for Master Science and PhD Art to 17% and 9% respectively. Likewise, the statistics of learners who just finished Master Art degree also fell drastically from 25% to 15% over the same period
- . 78
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home. Why is this? What are the effects on people themselves and their families? 56
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nsiderably to 24% and 27% by agreement. In a similar fashion, PhD degree's statistic witnessed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00921658986 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81849888257 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3866899315 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.777777778 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24834865205 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115018582582 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586279386393 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171067897431 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729111503595 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.