The chart shows the amount of waste production by British households since 1990 with predictions until 2030.
The line graph illustrates the number of waste production by households in the UK from 1990 with projections until 2030. Units are measured in kilograms.
Overall, the number of waste production in Britain households was primarily on plastic, glass, metal, batteries, and organic, while paper remains stable. These figures are predicted to move up gradually, except that glass and paper relatively unchanged.
It is noticeable that plastic waste was the highest production which started from roughly 45kg in 1990 and it has been envisaged to increase until 2030. Organic and glass had fluctuations years per years with 32kg and 30kg in 1990, respectively. Around 2017, Organic went up around 40kg, whereas glass stayed the same to about 32kg. The amount is foreseen to rise significantly, however, in 2030, glass outraced the organic with an approximation of about 50kg and 40kg respectively.
Although metals had just above110 kg in 1990 as compared to batteries to around 13kg with little fluctuations on years, it has been projected that batteries slightly overlap metals in 2030 to almost 20kg and just below 20 respectively. Paper remains steadily decrease with around 12kg of waste produced.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The chart below gives information on how much people in the United States and United Kingdom spend on petrol
- The table below shows the amount fish caught, in thousands tonnes , in 2008 and 2015 by eight European country. 84
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing ,and business and financial services -to the UK economy in the twentieth century. 84
- The pie charts show the percentage of water used by six different purposes in six different areas of the world 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36315789474 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81824782012 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9356097583 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285406997266 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109573613706 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993045083277 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180404613969 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809775927968 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.