The chart below shows the average weight of spoiled produce each week in British supermarkets since 1990 with predictions until 2030.
The line graph compares the amount of perished fruits weekly in supermarkets in the UK since 1990 and includes predicted figures until 2030. Units are measured in kilograms.
Overall, in the last 29 years, the quantity of all fruits becoming spoiled every week increased except for oranges, which remained the same, and this trend is expected for the next 11 years.
From the start, tomatoes have been the most perished fruit every week at around 35 kg and currently resting at almost 45 kg. Between 1990 and 2018, the amount of apples that have been spoiled weekly rose from about 21 kg to 30 kg and for pears it climbed from 20 kg to almost 24 kg. Bananas, grapes and oranges each began at approximately 2 kg but while the first two went up by roughly 4 kg and 2 kg respectively, oranges maintained the same figure.
By 2030, it is projected that the amount of spoiled tomatoes will continue rising to peak at about 55 kg, pears at approximately 35 kg to become the second ranked spoiled fruit, and apples to 30 kg. Bananas and grapes will climb slightly to roughly 8 kg and 5 kg respectively, while oranges will maintain the same value.
- Many parents believe that children should play team sports like football, basketball and so on, instead of individuals sports, such as swimming or running, during the school scheduled timetable. Do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001 82
- In recent years, many small shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this positive or a negative statement? 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60487804878 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5151344396 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9296369801 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114903275374 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621509670543 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827378581203 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975205554686 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847380430889 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.