The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the percentages of GDP from the IT industry and service industry of the UK between 1992 and 2000. Overall, it can be seen that the number of sales in the IT industry was higher than that in the service industry all over the period. Moreover, a rapid growth was seen in technology products, while the GDP of the service industry increased gradually.
To begin with, in 1992, approximately 6% of the GDP of the UK was from the IT industry, about 2% higher than that from the service industry. Although the figure of service sector rose to over 6% in 1994, it still gained fewer profits than the UK’s IT products, which was slightly more than 8%. However, in 1996, the IT sales decreased to just under 8%, whereas, 7% was accounted for the service.
A substantial increase in the IT industry was seen in 1996, jumping to 12% in 1998 before reaching the peak at about a quarter at the end of the period. On the other hand, the GDP of the service industry grew slowly to reach approximately 8% in 2000, about half of the IT’s number.
- The percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016
- The percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016
- the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 76
- The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007 86
- the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...illustrates the percentages of GDP from the IT industry and service industry of the UK...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...can be seen that the number of sales in the IT industry was higher than that in the se...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...mately 6% of the GDP of the UK was from the IT industry, about 2% higher than that fro...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...lightly more than 8%. However, in 1996, the IT sales decreased to just under 8%, where...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...he service. A substantial increase in the IT industry was seen in 1996, jumping to 1...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...approximately 8% in 2000, about half of the IT’s number.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, still, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51813471503 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5040330968 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497409326425 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.7513991953 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204481217124 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106874694081 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134978198696 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137459199283 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548299447759 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.