The Chart shows the fertility rates in China and USA from 1920 to 2000.
The Chart shows the fertility rates in China and USA from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, fertility in these two countries were fluctuated throughout the period and we also can see that birth rates of China and USA shared similar trend over the period.
In early 1920s, China birth rate was around 10 percent and USAs just slightly higher than that, but in late 1930s, Chinas rate passed USA for the first time in that period. As the rates went up and down together despite different number changes in percentage, we can say that both rates had identically fluctuated trend. They hit the highest peak of the period in early 1950s with 20 percent for China while 15 percent for USA.
After that year, both countries birth rates fell dramatically throughout the rest of the period and hit the lowest peak with less than 5 percent for China and around 7 to 8 percent for USA in mid 1980s and just increased slightly in late 1980s, but in the late of 1990s to 2000s both countries fertility went down again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 73
- Increasing divorce rate 73
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- People leaving rural areas 67
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... but in the late of 1990s to 2000s both countries fertility went down again.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58100558659 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2075876881 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2618468135 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376457539276 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275263099976 0.103423049105 266% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.327926936935 0.0843802449381 389% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.36800035062 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.366384195857 0.0819641961636 447% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.