The chart illustrates the frequency in which people ate fast food in restaurants in the USA during the period from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the percentage of people who either never ate or ate fast food every day has declined. However, the number of individuals who went to fast food restaurants rare times yearly has increased. Furthermore, there was a fluctuation in the number of people who ate weekly or monthly.
Regarding people who ate fast food several times a week, there was a fluctuation in the percentage peaking at 20% in 2006. Similarly, for those who went to fast food restaurants once a week, the number topped at 32%. On the other hand, the proportion of the population who ate once or twice a month hit the low point at 25% in the same period.
Concerning individuals who attended fast food restaurants every day, the rate dropped from 4% in 2003 to a steady number of 3% in the remaining period. Likewise, for those who never ate, the same trend was observed with a decline to 4% in 2006. However, there was a rise from 13% in 2003 to a constant rate of 15% between 2006 and 2013.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this Task Chart 1 below shows the normal price of a tablet computer in different stores in US dollars and the discount offered by these stores when the products are sold on promotion Chart 2 shows the increase in volum 82
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt to fast food restaurants once a week, the number topped at 32%. On the other h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, likewise, regarding, similarly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56783919598 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60627257805 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462311557789 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.406126531 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345845659084 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160642086922 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118773925825 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26594088409 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126368882246 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.