The bar chart provides information on the proportion of American's had eaten convenient food at restaurants over a period of ten years from 2003.
It can be seen from the graph that the remarkable number of people had taken fast food during once a week at around 33% in 2006 and 31% in 2003, while the figure in 2013 was just 27% respectively. But at the same time, in terms of once or twice a month visitors' intake was slightly lower except in 2013. However, the people who had intake food at eateries for few times a year was relatively less than many times taking food at week. When the former had visited less than 15% , the latter was just under 20% throughout the given period.
In contrast, the figure for daily visitor to food corners was significantly less. There were only 5% of people had consumed during the given period. Interestingly, none of them had taken any kind of junk food from 2003 to 2013, it was well under mere 5% .
All in all,it is clear from the graph that the percentage of people visited fast food corner was remarkably much higher in once in a week and once or twice a month than regular visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hen the former had visited less than 15% , the latter was just under 20% throughou...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 2003 to 2013, it was well under mere 5% . All in all,it is clear from the gra...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3 to 2013, it was well under mere 5% . All in all,it is clear from the graph th...
^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... was well under mere 5% . All in all,it is clear from the graph that the percen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, well, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48309178744 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36944060023 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8966983584 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181609963197 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817114032519 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049681864081 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122407509275 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023316079089 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.