The chart below illustrates the rate at which people ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 in the USA.
Overall, people in the USA visited fast food centres for their meals more once per week and once or twice a month between 2003 and 2013. Fewer people ate every day or never in fast food restaurants in the USA within these period.
In the USA, more humans had their meals once a week ( about 33%) in 2006 than other times while a higher percentage of them choose to eat in fast food centres once or twice a month in 2013 (about 33%) than other periods.
The frequency of people going to fast food restaurants to eat several times a week and a few times a year was on the average (20% and below) between 2003 and 2013 when compared to the number of them visiting the centres once a week. The number of people who ate every day and never in fast food centres was dramatically low (5% and below) through out the survey period.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features ,and make comaparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more humans had their meals once a week about 33% in 2006 than other times while...
^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... higher percentage of them choose to eat in fast food centres once or twice a mon...
^^
Line 6, column 336, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ntres was dramatically low 5% and below through out the survey period.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.31073446328 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09728594097 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45197740113 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3711981562 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416944488485 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265748705846 0.103423049105 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149052066297 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32513745908 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172544574961 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.31 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.