The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

Before us there is a bar chart that illustrates how often citizens of the United States of America choose fast food restaurants for a meal during the years of 2003 until 2013.

First of all, it is possible to observe that the majority of people goes there from a couple of times per month to one time per week, while the exceptions are the ones that never eat fast food or even fewer cases want to go there every single day.

Furthermore, the persons that are daily customers are less than 5% in the 3 studied years, although there is a sharp percentage increase if we talk about going several times per week, especially in 2006, reaching 20%. Again in the same year the majority of people say that they eat fast food once per week, on a average of more than 30%.

Less often, as one or two times per month is more common in 2013, which means that 30% of USA citizens go more rarely to these restaurants. Just a few times per year, we can observe that there were no change between 2006 and 2013 at 15% and a similar pattern is observed of the ones that never go, being represented by less than 5%

To sum up, the majority of people eat fast food from once a week to once a month in all 3 years but there is a slight decrease in regularity between 2006 and 2013 of these groups.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
... of the United States of America choose fast food restaurants for a meal during the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...at they eat fast food once per week, on a average of more than 30%. Less ofte...
^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er go, being represented by less than 5% To sum up, the majority of people eat fa...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26530612245 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17518472122 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.1399175214 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.166666667 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.8333333333 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212280376211 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111101692117 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083017125416 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130707565609 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772768633158 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.37 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.