The chart shows how frequently people to the USA ate fast food restaurants
The bar chart illustrates how often the American people ate in fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
To sum up, the types of frequency that most people had fast food in restaurants are “once a week” and “once or twice a month” between 2003 and 2013. In contrast, the types of frequency that the smallest number of people went to the restaurants where there was fast food are “every day” and “never” from 2003 to 2013.
There was a slight drop in the number of people who ate at the fast food restaurants every day from 4 percent in 2003 to about 3 percent in 2006 and then remained stable over the next seven years. Similarly, the frequency that people never having food in the restaurants dropped moderately by nearly 1 percent between 2003 and 2006 and then levelled off by 2013.
By contrast, the first 3 years witnessed a growth to a peak (20 percent), followed by a 7-year-period slight drop at 16 percent of the people who ate at fast food restaurant several times a week. There is . same frequency that people went to fast food restaurants once a week.
- When new towns are planned it is more important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- When new towns are planned it is more important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 2006 and then levelled off by 2013. By contrast, the first 3 years witnessed...
^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...estaurant several times a week. There is . same frequency that people went to fast...
^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Same
...aurant several times a week. There is . same frequency that people went to fast food...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, then, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61658031088 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57682985038 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2594119391 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355568719117 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190444739069 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113659831185 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271715035021 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920264972881 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.