The given bar chart depicts the data of utilization cell and stationary people per 100 people in 6 different countries in North America and Europe.
Overall, both methods of communicating have been widespread in the provided countries, landlines would take a lead mainly in the US and Canada whereas cell phones are to be preferable choice in every given European country except Denmark.
On the western side of the planet, more precisely on the North American continent, approximately 38 to 47 of citizens in Canada and the US respectively, use cell phones as their main option to communicate. Meanwhile, landlines are taking the attention of 60 to 75 individuals. Western European people tend to use mobile devices way more frequently, as over 70 people of each country apply them in their everyday life where the highest amount is in Italy reaching 90 people. Although the use of mobile devices is way more common, the use of office and home devices has remained quite similar in Denmark along with Germany. There is a large discrepancy between the number of individuals using landlines in Italy.
- WRITING TASK 1You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chartshows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how peoplethink the costs of adult education sh 78
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 78
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0218579235 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81292877727 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2049662465 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195715945049 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871320826914 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659288160101 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144203083295 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621276058567 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.