The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018.
The given line graph exhibits how many stores were closed and how many new stores were opened in a single country during the period of eight years (from 2011 to 2018).
In brief, the number of shops closed and opened saw considerable fluctuations over a specific period. However, the closures outpaced the openings in all years except 2011 and 2015.
The number of new shops started at around 8500 in 2011. After a slump of about 3500 in the following year, openings made a rebound, reaching almost the same levels as that of closings in 2014 with a little over 6000. The figure then climbed down significantly again to its 2012 quantity in 2015, where it stayed nearly unchanged before falling to an all-time low of 3000 in 2018.
The figure for closures varied roughly between 6000 and 7000 over the first four-year period. Afterward, in 2015, it hit its lowest peak at well above 600. Nevertheless, this quantity boomed to a plateau at more than 5000 in 2016 and remained at this level until the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
| 2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
| 2023-05-27 | Dangdang | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-03 | vịt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-21 | adamneyul | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, then, well, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70555555556 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33816299108 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3497577881 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269838452209 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111502883352 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126734252363 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167011947559 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103123056418 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.