The given bar chart provides information about overweight in two type of genders, how many male and female's percentages in Australia over a thirty-year period between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were significantly differences between men and women. Another interesting point is that males' obesity were higher rates while in 1980 other calculated years' schedule. In addition women and men obesity was less numbers in the half of decade.
Looking at the details men's overweight started in small numbers in 1980 while afterwards by 1990, men ate significantly than past year.
As regards, female's obesity was experienced eating less than men at that years. In the other half of the decade, it can be seen that extremely big obesity in two types gender. In 2000, men obesity number rose dramatically than females' weight. This meant that, for males' 65 and for females' approximately 52. Subsequently, by 2010, food eaten less percents than a past year, 2000. It was about 60 for male and 52 for female
- Transport preferences amongyoung people from different countries 73
- The pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the results of survey of people s perceptions of celebrety news coverage
- The chart below shows the percentage of population in the UK who consumed the recomeded daily amounts of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun male seems to be countable; consider using: 'many males'.
Suggestion: many males
... overweight in two type of genders, how many male and females percentages in Australia ov...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in Australia over a thirty-year period between 1980 and 2010. Overall, what...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds out from the graph is that there were significantly differences between men an...
^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'males'' or 'male's', 'malis's'?
Suggestion: males'; male's; malis's
...omen. Another interesting point is that males obesity were higher rates while in 1980...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...980 other calculated years schedule. In addition women and men obesity was less numbers ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun numbers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... In addition women and men obesity was less numbers in the half of decade. Looki...
^^^^
Line 6, column 342, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun percents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...y 52. Subsequently, by 2010, food eaten less percents than a past year, 2000. It was...
^^^^
Line 6, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percents than a past year, 2000. It was about 60 for male and 52 for female
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02873563218 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67441526831 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5167180365 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5454545455 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250716295082 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873177514877 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851832580378 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15868210756 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099403624525 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.