The chart shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed
the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The graph illustrates the pattern of consumption of fruit and vegetables are suggested regularly in Britain in three years.
It is clear that the portion of fruit and vegetables consumed on a daily basis in the year 2006 was the highest throughout the period. While women was reported to be the greatest consumer of fruit and vegetable during the whole timescale, the reverse was true of children.
By 2002, the proportion of daily consumption of fruit and vegetables of women was the highest at 25%, which was much higher than the figures for men and children, at 22% and 11% respectively. In the subsequent four years, women continued to be the major consumer with figures increasing 7% higher than at the beginning of the period. The same pattern was observed in the others, whose figures saw an upward trend, growing significantly to 28% and 16% respectively.
In the last four years of the period experienced a noticeable decline of all categories, with the most remarkable reduction in the number of fruits and vegetables eaten a day by women, from 32% to 27%. Furthermore, despite the daily consumption of fruits and vegetables of men and children both decreasing, reduction rate of the latter was half as much as when compared to the former in 2010.l
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Chloe Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Cicihg | view | |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when compared to the former in 2010.l
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90697674419 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85446525232 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9876487491 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189002381639 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927942616048 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627323663406 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122467165327 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463418610187 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.