The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of people in UK who followed the recommendation for the daily amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010
In general, the percentages of fruit and vegetable consumers in British tended to increase during the period shown. It was true that children ate a smaller amount of fruit and vegetable than adults.
In 2002, there was 22% men compared to the total of the population in UK consumed fruit and vegetable while that number of women was 25%. The data of children was the lowest with only 11%.
These was the slight growth after 4 years in the number of people eating enough fruit and vegetable as recommendation. The percentage of men consumers rose 6% to 28% while these was up to 32% women decided eating the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetable. Children was still be the lowest figure, however, it experienced the slowly growth to 16%.
After witnessing the increase, there was the decrease in propotions of fruit and vegetable consumers in 2010. From 28% in 2006, the data for consumers, who was men dropped to 24%. This number of women saw the similar change which went down 5%. It was manifest from the graph that the percentage of children also fell 2% and stopped at 14%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Chloe Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Cicihg | view | |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 70 | view |
- Nowadays people are able to use internet to do an increasing number of tasks Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Competition for university study is becoming increasingly strong Why are universities becoming more competent Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 1 The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
... children was the lowest with only 11%. These was the slight growth after 4 years in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 286, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...fruit and vegetable. Children was still be the lowest figure, however, it experien...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75688073394 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5935773326 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6491177109 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2727272727 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364742455273 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134070709106 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145114006485 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23890772815 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134491389851 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.