The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interest in certain sports.
The bar graph compares the favorable level among six sports in three different years in Britain. In general, the foot portion was recorded as the most popular sport for a decade, while golf was the less common subject for the public.
In 1995, golf was played by 18% of people, and this data declined by 3% after five years, then rose to 16% in 2005. Following the same trend, the figure for snooker and rugby accounted for 23% and 27% at the end, respectively. However, the data on rugby has a different point when the initial was 24%, which is lower than 27% of the finish.
According to the leftover sports, the proportion of foot was increased continuously in 10 years, and occupied 44%. It can be seen that the number of swimmers in 1995 was half, compared with that for foot. Nevertheless, the figure for swim reached its peak at the beginning, but it shrunk dramatically to 22% and maintained that level until the end.
- More and more people these days work harder and longer hours and have no time for family life and friends What are the causes in your opinion for this How it is affecting family life and society as a whole 56
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interest in certain sports 11
- In the future the main reason for going to the shopping mall will be for entertainment not to shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagrams below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature Write a 150 word description of this diagram for a university lecturer 78
- In the future the main reason for going to the shopping mall will be for entertainment not to shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65060240964 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46269893617 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656626506024 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.9189243157 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.063492665188 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318058553559 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505823971097 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0484391207734 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441279667618 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.