Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
When it comes to the funding of artists, there are divided views. There is a tendency to assert that money for art projects should be given by the government, while others feel that private organisations ought to spend expenditure on developing these projects. In this order, I will elaborate on these differing perspectives as well as to elucidate my own personal insight.
It is believed that art has a significant influence on the image of a state. To begin with, there were numerous works of art in public spaces which beautified the city. In Ha Noi, for example, a ceramic road of Nguyen Khoai street was created for the 1000th birthday of Vietnam’s capital. This project, recognised as the longest ceramic painting, represents history, culture and several meaningful messages. In addition, artists play an essential role in spreading a country’s attractiveness by combining traditional values with the latest art trend to promote cultural products. Investing to expand these strategies is a way to captivate tourists and profit from the tourism industry.
On the other hand, it seems easy to realise governments have more important concerns. At first, it is impossible to argue against the fact that state budgets have a duty to be spent on various issues, such as education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. Moreover, private companies also have a chance to cooperate with artists to promote their products. In fact, these cooperations bring massive revenue for both sides, especially for the well-known artist.
To conclude, I believe art projects need to be developed and funded by considerable budgets, which should come from many sources, including other individuals or businesses and the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- the table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe
- In the future the main reason for going to the shopping mall will be for entertainment not to shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In the future the main reason for going to the shopping mall will be for entertainment not to shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- the maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 78
- the table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35507246377 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98452213943 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659420289855 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5519862946 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135610054023 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404121443917 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342069259675 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085463579606 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361682724882 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.