The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports.
The bar chart illustrates the interest of British people towards different sports being surveyed from 1995 to 2005
Overall, the percentage of British people having the interest of foot, swim and rugby exhibited an upward trend over the 10-year period, whereas other sports exhibited a contrasting pattern. Moreover, the percentage of people loving going by foot was the highest all over the period.
In 1995, approximately 41% of British people loved jogging, while around 23% of people interested in swimming and playing rugby. Following 5 years, the figure for rugby and swim increased significantly to around 27% each, before dropping slightly to 25% in 2005. Meanwhile, those of jooging rose steadily, and hit the highest point at around 44% in 2005.
Regarding to other sports, the rate of people having interest of snooker reached at 30% in 1995. The figure for snooker decreased sharply to 21% over 5 years, before rosing slightly to 23% in 2005. Meanwhile, around 27% of those loving tennis in 1995, before witnessing a sigficant decline to 23% in 2000 and maintained a marginal presence at the end of the period. Golf was the least popular sport which reached 15% of those loving this sport in 1995. The number of people playing golf declined slightly to 13% in 2000, before increasing to 14% in 2005.
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00456621005 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54537439249 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3687620204 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134810215422 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522905642354 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629988618274 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111253378975 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738903649436 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.