The pie charts illustrates the results of examinations in an African country surveying the main reasons teenagers use their mobile devices between 2016 and 2019. While the other three reasons made up around half of each chart, social networks were dominant in all four years.
Online social platforms held the number one spot throughout the years with 50% in 2016, followed by an insignificant decrease in 2017. The year 2018 witnessed a small rise to 51%. Its percentage had sharply increased by 5% in 2019, from 51% to 56%. Phone calls owned the least proportion of all. Starting with 10% in 2016, it inclined to 13% the next year, which then dropped to 11% in 2018. 2019 saw a huge decline by 6% back to just 5%.
Email took up a quarter in both 2016 and 2017 and one fifth of 2018, then remained nearly the same in 2019. Digital camera first held the 3rd place with 15% in 2016 and 2017. It slightly increased by 3% in 2018, then officially surpassed email to become the 2nd primary purpose for teens.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tworks were dominant in all four years. Online social platforms held the number ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59116022099 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33736266915 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690607734807 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.411935162 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5454545455 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218727869488 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718784697762 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113098503794 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150856716669 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113510840069 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.