The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
The researched pie charts depict why teenagers use mobile phones in an African country from 2016 to 2019.
The initial impression from the charts is social networks was the biggest reason why teenagers keep using their phones. Using phone for phone calls was the reasons had a variety of tranformation during the give course
Most teenagers in 2016 to 2019 used their phone for social networks. As we can see in the pie charts, in 2016, this reason accounted for a half of the chart, then it sightly decreased to 48 percent.
In 2018, the researched teenagers using phones for social networks raised to 51 percent and continued to grow to 56 percent in the next 1 year. Besides that, there were also a variety of youngsters who use phones to send email. In the first year of the given period, using phone for sending email occupied with one-forth of the chart and almost did not change next year. But there was a difference that it strongly fell to 20 percent and reminded unchanged in the next year.
In addition, satisfying picture demand was also one of reason why teenagers keep using phones. In 2016, the teenagers using phones for digital cameras accounted for 15 percent and unchanged in 2017. In 2018, it grew to 18 per cent and then sightly increased to 20 percent. The last reasons which have been found among the researched teenagers is using for phone calls. In the first year of the researched course, this reason just occupied with 10 percent and in the next year, it raised to 13 percent. But in the last 2 years of the researched, this reason decreased, 11 percent and 5 percent respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Phạm Gia Bảo | view | |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | drikbest | 67 | view |
Comments
marking this exercise for me…
marking this exercise for me plz
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... phones. Using phone for phone calls was the reasons had a variety of tranformati...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d for 15 percent and unchanged in 2017. In 2018, it grew to 18 per cent and then s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67957746479 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44696523501 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482394366197 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2704756341 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348454008087 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141143262574 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105839004238 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248619819147 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645870544092 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.